"Protocols in physics or biology specify clear guidelines, which even in terms of the rather imprecise subjects being studied in our discipline must be adapted," explains the economist. Only through the repeated confirmation of research results can they be accepted as fact. But, according to Sarstedt, despite the disparity between the subjects being studied, reproducibility is simply an essential element of science. Whilst physics generally deal with precisely defined and measurable quantities such as lengths, masses and temperatures, concepts such as satisfaction and happiness are not clearly defined and are measured and interpreted differently depending on the team of researchers. "Behavioral scientists such as economists and psychologists must do the same when measuring unobservable concepts such as satisfaction and happiness - even if it is difficult." "Physicists, engineers, physicians and biologists do this by stating the measurement inaccuracy of their instruments, for example of a thermometer or scale," explains Sarstedt. Researchers in the behavioral sciences need to try to incorporate the impact of interference factors directly and fully into their results. "Although providing corresponding calibration data for the measurement of social phenomena is difficult to conceive of, it is not impossible." In the study the economists advocate transferring concepts from the natural sciences to the behavioral sciences and show, using a sample calculation, what major consequences the allowance for measurement uncertainty can have for a seemingly statistically significant result. According to the economist and co-author, Professor Marko Sarstedt, in physics no study would pass muster without stating the accuracy of the measurements used. They argue that established checklists that are intended to make important aspects of the studies transparent are inadequate. In a recently published study, the economists investigated why so much research work in the behavioral sciences is not reproducible - or only to a limited extent. Only in this way can the sources of errors be identified and eliminated. They believe that the inherent uncertainties in measured values must be described and quantified in order to enhance the reproducibility of measurement series. view moreĮconomists working with Professor Marko Sarstedt from Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg are demanding that the same scientific standards be applied to economics and the behavioral sciences in general as are used in the natural sciences. Image: Professor Marko Sarstedt is Chair of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Management at the University of Magdeburg.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |